When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our ...

Retraction data points to better identification of scientific misconduct and the negative impact of the publish-or-perish ...

Harvard researchers are far from immune to retractions, according to new data published online last month. In October, Retraction Watch — a blog “tracking retractions as a window into the scientific ...

Launched in 2010 by American science journalists Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky, the Retraction Watch website has become a valuable source of information on cases of scientific misconduct from around ...

The Center for Scientific Integrity, the organisation behind the Retraction Watch blog and database, and Crossref, the global infrastructure underpinning research communications, both not-for-profits, ...

Retractions — when an academic journal withdraws an already published study — are a big deal for researchers. Such withdrawals correct the record and remove faulty information from circulation, and ...

Crossref, a nonprofit organization created by academic publishers to generate digital object identifiers (DOIs) for scientific articles and documents, has purchased Retraction Watch’s database, which ...

On Thursday (October 25), the blog Retraction Watch, which tracks problematic scientific literature, released an online database of more than 18,000 papers and conference materials that have been ...

The Anusandhan National Research Foundation has made it mandatory for grant applicants to declare details and reasons for any ...

Conventional wisdom says that most retractions of papers in scientific journals are triggered by unintentional errors. Not so, according to one of the largest-ever studies of retractions. A survey ...

Conventional wisdom says that most retractions of papers in scientific journals are triggered by unintentional errors. Not so, according to one of the largest-ever studies of retractions. A survey 1 ...