The Matrix Revolutions (2003) Moviestore/Shutterstock Hugo Weaving in 'The Matrix Revolutions.' Released six months after Reloaded, the original trilogy concludes with The Matrix Revolutions.

The Matrix Revolutions doesn’t tell a traditional story — nor does it center a traditional hero.

The last entry in the franchise was “The Matrix Revolutions,” which hit theaters way back on November 5, 2003. It followed “The Matrix Reloaded,” which opened on May 15, 2003.

If The Matrix Resurrections turns out to be the barn-burning years-later sequel of our dreams, consider that the choices of The Matrix Revolutions may have laid the groundwork.

By the time the original trilogy ended with The Matrix Revolutions, which celebrates its 20th anniversary this November, those fears had taken a back seat to the stark realities of the early 2000s.

For those headed into The Matrix Resurrections, we have answers (we hope), as we break down how the original Matrix trilogy ended.

For a film series that is just as mind-bending now as it was when it first came out, "The Matrix" movies are relatively easy to watch.

With this in mind, there is so much that can be examined in a new game if it were to bridge the gap between The Matrix Revolutions and The Matrix Resurrections. The last time audiences saw this ...

Man of Steel's Metropolis battle was extremely divisive, but storyboard artist Jay Oliva has now explained how The Matrix Revolutions was key for dreaming up the movie's otherwise epic fight ...

But it’s certainly well above The Matrix Revolutions, which has a 35% on the site, and was deemed a mostly not-great finale to the trilogy by fans and critics alike.

The fourth movie in the needlessly prolonged franchise, coming 18 years after the horrendous “The Matrix Revolutions” is “The Matrix Resurrections,” a descent not so much into Lana and ...